
Varanasi:
The Archeological Survey of India (ASI) has resumed its survey of the Gyanvapi Mosque in Varanasi to find out if it was constructed over a Hindu temple. The mosque committee has challenged the survey within the Supreme Courtroom.
Listed below are 10 factors on this massive story:
-
The Allahabad Excessive Courtroom on Thursday gave its nod for a ‘scientific survey’ of the mosque saying that it was warranted within the curiosity of justice.
-
“Within the opinion of the Courtroom, the scientific survey/investigation proposed is critical within the curiosity of justice and shall profit the plaintiffs and defendants alike and are available in assist of the trial court docket to reach at a simply resolution. The (trial) court docket was justified in passing the impugned order,” the bench stated in its 16-page verdict.
-
A number of BJP leaders welcomed the excessive court docket verdict, saying the “fact” in regards to the temple on the web site will now come out.
-
The mosque committee has challenged the ruling in Supreme Courtroom, a request that might be heard later at present.
-
One of many events from the Hindu facet has additionally filed a caveat within the Supreme Courtroom saying no orders be handed with out listening to them within the matter.
-
The Hindu petitioners contend {that a} temple existed earlier on the web site and it was demolished within the seventeenth Century on the orders of Mughal emperor Aurangzeb.
-
Earlier, the Supreme Courtroom had barred any survey contained in the mosque complicated. The mosque’s ‘wazukhana’ — the place a construction that the petitioners claimed was a ‘shivling’ — is not going to be inside the ambit of the contemporary survey consistent with the Supreme Courtroom order.
-
The ‘scientific survey’ was ordered by a Varanasi district court docket on July 21 after 4 ladies filed a petition claiming that it was the one method to decide if the landmark mosque was constructed after razing a Hindu temple.
-
The survey began on July 24, but it surely was stayed inside hours by the Supreme Courtroom after the mosque committee approached it.
-
The mosque committee had argued that the construction is over a thousand years previous and any digging would possibly destabilise it, resulting in its collapse. The committee had additionally argued that any such survey is in violation of present legal guidelines round non secular locations.
Featured Video Of The Day
Digital Private Information Safety Invoice Tabled In Parliament: Provisions Defined